❌🗑 Bad tests 🗑❌

🤖 EA name:
1) AR EA
2) EA Scalpcyan
3) Jaga Lilin

💻 Platform: MT4
🛠Vendor/Source: MQL5/Subscriber
⚠️ Attention: Recommended best VPS

🏛 Tick Data Provider: Darwinex (TDSv2)
🧭 GMT: +2; DST: US
Real spread: ✅
Slippage: ❌

In order to download an adviser with tests, go to our telegram channel 👇


Description of expert advisor testing campaigns using Tick Data Suite

As the world of Forex trading continues to evolve, traders are always on the lookout for tools and strategies that promise profitability. MetaTrader 4 (MT4) Advisors have gained immense popularity, offering automated trading solutions to streamline the trading process. However, the claims of a 99% success rate through TDS testing have sparked curiosity and skepticism within the trading community.

Understanding TDS Testing: TDS, or Trading Decision Support, testing is a method employed to assess the performance of Expert Advisors (EAs) in various market conditions. Traders rely on these tests to determine the effectiveness of MT4 Advisors and make informed decisions about their deployment in live trading environments.

The 99% Success Rate Claim: Several MT4 Advisors, including AR EA, EA Scalpcyan, and Jaga Lilin, claim a 99% success rate based on TDS testing. This seemingly impressive figure suggests that the expert advisors perform exceptionally well under a wide range of market scenarios. Traders are enticed by the promise of consistent profits and minimized risks, making these advisors immensely popular.

Unveiling the Reality – Bad Tests: Upon closer scrutiny, however, it becomes apparent that not all TDS tests are created equal. Some testing methodologies may lack rigor, and the parameters chosen for evaluation might not accurately represent real market conditions. Traders need to be cautious when interpreting the 99% success rate, as it might be the result of over-optimization or selective data inclusion.

Challenges and Risks: Trusting an MT4 Advisor solely based on a high success rate in TDS MT4 advisors tested can be risky. Market conditions are dynamic, and historical success does not guarantee future performance. Over-reliance on backtesting results without considering potential risks and market changes can lead to significant losses.

Recommendations for Traders:

  1. Verify Testing Methodologies: Before trusting the claims of a high success rate, traders should scrutinize the testing methodologies used. Transparent and robust testing procedures, such as realistic slippage and variable spreads, contribute to more reliable results.
  2. Diversify Strategies: Relying on a single MT4 Advisor, even with a high success rate, is not foolproof. Traders should diversify their strategies and consider combining different expert advisors, such as AR EA, EA Scalpcyan, and Jaga Lilin, to mitigate risks and enhance overall portfolio performance.
  3. Continuous Monitoring: Market conditions evolve, and what works well in one period may not be as effective in another. Traders should continuously monitor and reassess their MT4 Advisors, adapting to changing market dynamics.

Conclusions about testing advisors

While the allure of a 99% success rate in TDS testing may be tempting, traders must exercise caution and conduct due diligence. The reality behind these claims often involves complex market dynamics and the need for ongoing monitoring and adaptation. By understanding the limitations of testing methodologies and embracing a diversified and adaptive approach, traders can navigate the complexities of the Forex market more effectively and make informed decisions about the deployment of MT4 advisors tested, such as AR EA, EA Scalpcyan, and Jaga Lilin, in their trading strategies.


Leave a Reply